Renal function at admission as a prognostic marker for patients hospitalised for a first episode of heart failure. Results of the PREDICE study. / Función renal al ingreso como marcador pronóstico en pacientes hospitalizados por un primer episodio de insuficiencia cardíaca. Resultados del estudio PREDICE.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Heart failure (HF) is a frequent condition that deteriorates quality of life and results in high morbidity and mortality. A considerable number of studies have been implemented in recent years to determine the factors that affect the prognosis of HF; however, few studies have assessed the prognosis of patients hospitalised for their first episode of HF. The aim of our study was to analyse the prognostic impact of renal function on patients hospitalised for a first episode of HF. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We recruited 600 patients hospitalised for a first episode of HF in 3 tertiary Spanish hospitals. We analysed the mortality risk during the first year of follow-up according to renal function at the time of admission. RESULTS: The patients with the highest degree of kidney failure at admission were older (P<.001), were more often women (p=.01) and presented a higher degree of dependence (P<.05), as well as a higher prevalence of arterial hypertension (P<.001), chronic renal failure (P<.001) and anaemia (P<.001). In the multivariate analysis, the degree of kidney failure at admission remained an independent predictor of increased mortality risk during the first year of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of kidney failure at admission was a marker of poor prognosis in our cohort of patients hospitalised for a first episode of HF.

Delphi-RAND consensus of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine on the controversies in anticoagulant therapy and prophylaxis in medical diseases. INTROMBIN Project (Uncertainty in thromboprophylaxis in internal medicine). / Consenso Delphi-RAND de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna sobre controversias en terapia y profilaxis anticoagulante en enfermedades médicas. Proyecto INTROMBIN (INcertidumbre en TROMBoprofilaxis en Medicina INterna).

The aim of this study was to determine the opinion of internists on the management of anticoagulation and thromboembolism prophylaxis in complex clinical scenarios in which the risk-benefit ratio of surgery is narrow and to develop a consensus document on the use of drugs anticoagulant therapy in this patient group. To this end, we identified by consensus the clinical areas of greatest uncertainty, a survey was created with 20 scenarios laid out in 40 clinical questions, and we reviewed the specific literature. The survey was distributed among the internists of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI) and was completed by 290 of its members. The consensus process was implemented by changing the Delphi-RAND appropriateness method in an anonymous, double-round process that enabled an expert panel to identify the areas of agreement and uncertainty. In our case, we also added the survey results to the panel, a methodological innovation that helps provide additional information on the standard clinical practice. The result of the process is a set of 19 recommendations formulated by SEMI experts, which helps establish guidelines for action on anticoagulant therapy in complex scenarios (high risk or active haemorrhage, short life expectancy, coexistence of antiplatelet therapy or comorbidities such as kidney disease and liver disease), which are not uncommon in standard clinical practice.

Assessment of thromboprophylaxis in medical patients hospitalized in Andalusia. A multicenter study. / Adecuación de tromboprofilaxis en pacientes médicos hospitalizados en Andalucía. Estudio multicéntrico.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hospitalized patients are a population at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The PRETEMED-2007 clinical practice guidelines help identify high-risk medical patients who are suited to thromboprophylaxis. These guidelines therefore provide a standard for prophylaxis in such patients. We evaluated the risk of VTE and the adjustment of thromboprophylaxis to the standards of the PRETEMED-2007 guidelines in patients hospitalized in internal medicine departments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional multicenter study was performed in 2010 in 16 hospitals in Andalusia and included 20 consecutive patients per center. The study variables were age, sex, risk factors for VTE and hemorrhage, the risk-adjusted PRETEMED of VTE, adjustment of thromboembolic prophylaxis at admission and at discharge and hospital mortality. RESULTS: The study included 293 patients (57.8% men) with a mean age of 69 (±15) years. The most common triggers for VTE were acute severe infection (27.3%) and neoplasia (16.4%). Some 43.4% of the patients presented a risk of hemorrhage. The risk of VTE at admission and discharge was high in 47.8% and 31% and moderate in 8.2% and 10.6%, respectively. A total of 91.7% and 17.3% of the patients underwent prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin on admission and at discharge, respectively. The prescription was appropriate for 59.9% of the patients at admission (overutilization 38.4%, underutilization 1.7%) and for 74.7% at discharge (overutilization 5.4%, underutilization 19.9%). The adjustment was greater in patients older than 60 years and with greater hemorrhagic risk. CONCLUSIONS: For 60% of the patients admitted to the departments of internal medicine in Andalusia, the thromboprophylaxis was appropriate. The inadequacy of thromboprophylaxis (40%) is mostly due to overutilization. These results suggest significant space for improvement.

[Are the guidelines guiding us reliable? Evaluation of the Spanish clinical practice guidelines]. / Las guías que nos guían son fiables? Evaluación de las guías de práctica clínica españolas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There is a large proliferation of clinical practice guidelines (CPG), there being doubts on inconsistencies between the recommendations made and internal incongruencies, that affect the role of the guidelines as instruments helping the clinicians. This study aims to analyze the quality of a group of Spanish CPG and to assess the feasibility of use and consistency of the AGREE Instrument in its Spanish version, designed to evaluate the CPG. METHOD: A total of 278 CPG produced in Spain between January 1990 and December 2002 were identified. The originals of 61 guidelines were recovered from their authors and passed to the AGREE Instrument independently by four raters. Quality of the guidelines feasibility and reproducibility of AGREE were analyzed. RESULTS: For all the attributes of AGREE except in the editorial independence, more than 60% of the guidelines evaluated obtained a poor quality score, there being no domain in which more than 10% of the guidelines was excellent. The worst grading areas are those of applicability, participation and rigour of development of the guidelines. Of the 61 guidelines evaluated, the reviewers graded 25 as "very poor quality", 26 as "non recommendable" and 6 and 4 as "recommendable" or "highly recommendable", respectively. Interrater consistency was high. CONCLUSIONS: The mean quality of the Spanish guidelines evaluated is very low. The AGREE Instrument in its Spanish version is consistent for the Spanish guidelines and easy to use.